InsideArchivesContact UsMaps

 

UKRAINE

I.  Information Ministry downgraded.

        [On 13th March], the number of ministries in Ukraine has fallen from 21 to 18, while the number of [state] committees will become directly subordinate to relevant ministries. . . . Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma signed a decree “On changes to the system of central bodies of the executive power of Ukraine.”  Under the decree, the Ministry of Information, the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Family and Youth Affairs have been dissolved.
 The State Committee for Information Policy, the State Committee for Science and Intellectual Ownership and the State Committee for Family and Youth Affairs were created on the basis of the above ministries.  The newly-created State Committee for Communications [and] Information incorporates the former State Committee for Communications . . . and the Main Directorate for Radio Frequencies.

Ukrainian Television First Programme, Kiev, March 13, 1999

II.  First radio channel signs deal with TV-radio company.

        The TV and radio company Era has signed a five-year cooperation agreement with the Ukrainian national radio company, the Ukrainian newspaper ‘Den’ reported on 5th March.  Under the agreement, UR-1, the first channel of Ukrainian radio, will broadcast programmes made by Radio Era, the newspaper said.  For the most part, the programmes are made by the staff of the Ukrainian national radio company who are also employed by Era on a part-time basis.

‘Den,’ Kiev, March 5, 1999

III.  STB TV faces problems ahead of election.

        The director of our channel, Mykola Knyazhytskyy, [on 4th March] called a news conference to explain the recent events around STB [TV].
[Correspondent]        Knyazhytskyy directly connected the events around the channel with the coming presidential elections and preparations for them by the oligarchic clans, whose activities have been investigated by STB journalists . . . .
        Today we are witnessing a constant redistribution of the television space.  Knyazhytskyy believes that the only reason that so far nobody has tried to buy the channel out is because some people are probably planning to annihilate it . . . .
        Knyazhytskyy connects the current pressure on STB with his recent job as head of the National Television Company of Ukraine and the numerous violations disclosed during that period.   He does not rule out the possibility that, should the lives of the staff be endangered, STB might change certain programmes, but that would be the last resort.
[Knyazhytskyy]        We will do everything to report the truth.  But if this truth is dangerous to human lives, sure, we will not be able to do it.  The main idea is that somebody should tell the truth.  If there is nobody, the style will change.

Ukrainian STB TV, Kiev, March 4, 1999

IV.  TV watchdog to include officials from all factions.

        On 3rd March, the Ukrainian parliament adopted amendments to the law “On the network of social television and radio broadcasting,” Intelnews news agency reported on the 4th.
        The amendments provide for the National Council for Television and Radio Broadcasting to include not just four representatives of the legislature but a representative from each faction or deputy group in parliament.

Intelnews news agency, Kiev, March 4, 1999

V.  Debts force Kiev TV channel off the air.

[Presenter]        [On 22nd February], the Kiev radio and TV transmitting centre stopped broadcasting the programmes of the NART television and radio broadcasting company.  The managers of the radio broadcasting, radio communication and television concern said this happened because of the huge debt the company had accumulated for their services.  Several other Kiev TV and radio companies were given a warning.  The managers said they had stopped broadcasting solely for economic reasons and there was no question of political persecution.
[Correspondent]        There was no programme by the NART creative union on the air this morning.  The company’s office first said that this was a routine repair, but later they said that for political reasons, NART would not be on the air in the immediate future.  Only Kievans could watch NART’s programmes on UHF channel 25.
        Its few admirers will remember exclusive dialogues and monologues by Volodymyr Tsendrovskyy, who is well known in TV circles.  They say that almost all MPs from the last parliament and many from this parliament took the floor in his programmes.  Maybe because of this the NART management is talking about there being political grounds for the stoppage of broadcasting.  However, workers at the Kiev radio and TV transmitting centre say that NART’s being refused airtime is not a sensation because the same thing has happened to other debtors.
[Valeriy Yurchenko, captioned as the president of the radio broadcasting, radio communication and television concern] Mr Tsendrovskyy was here [on 22nd February] and we reached an agreement that if he starts covering his 175,000 hryvnya debt even at a rate of 5,000 hryvnyas per week, we will resume broadcasting [on 23rd].  This is not politics but economics, whatever they may say.
[Correspondent]        According to Yurchenko, national radio and TV companies remain the largest debtors.  Their debt accumulated in the last three years totals 74m hryvnyas and there is little hope that it will be repaid.  For this reason, the management of the radio and TV transmitting centre will ask the government to help solve the financial problems of the First National [TV channel].  To avoid accusations of political bias the managers suggest that only those companies which are able to pay be issued with licences.

Ukrainian Television Second Programme, Kiev, February 22, 1999

 

Last Updated: 11/20/99

 

© 1999 Post-Soviet Media Law & Policy Newsletter
Designed and maintained by Peter Yu

Web Policy