InsideArchivesContact UsMaps

 

CONTROVERSIAL ORT
PRESENTER TAKEN OFF THE AIR

I.  Controversial ORT presenter taken off air again.

        Admirers of [Saturday “Vremya” presenter] Sergey Dorenko will have to be disappointed again:  he will not go on the air [on 6th March].  But in an interview with Ekho Moskvy he explained some of the reasons for this decision.
[Dorenko] On the whole, these removals and disappearances of mine are connected with fierce pressure on the channel.  When the survival of the channel is at stake, then I, to be honest, have to take the decision to remain offscreen in order to preserve the company and to avoid creating any major problems for it.  Naturally, why should this be a problem, you will ask.  But the reply is very simple.  Russia is now living through a period of the redistribution of power in the country.  The same applies to the national television.  An offensive, a vigorous offensive is being mounted on the mass media by the Communists, the special services and government structures.

Ekho Moskvy radio, Moscow, March 6, 1999

II.  Controversial ORT presenter to stay off the air.

        On [27th February], after a three-week intermission, the “Analysis” programme was back on the air on the ORT [Russian Public Television] channel.  That evening, however, the complex situation also became absurd! First the “Analysis programme with Sergey Dorenko” logo appeared and then reporter Ivan Konovalov appeared on the screen and remarked gloomily:  “I have been asked to present this programme.”
        Amusing as it may be, but the day before the programme went on air, Sergey Dorenko, while giving an interview to ‘Komsomolskaya Pravda,’ had no doubt that he himself would present the programme.  I had to call Sergey again.
        “On the one hand, it was a change for the better for me:  the programme appeared under our own logo.  But on the other hand, the situation has started to become farcical.  I am alive and well, you could send me into space, but I do not want to go into space.  I want to present my own programme, and that is not what is happening.
        “I can tell you absolutely sincerely:  If they sack [ORT head] Igor Shabdurasulov tomorrow and if the government sends a KGB general to replace him the day after tomorrow, then the following day I will resign from the First Channel.  That is why I want Igor Vladimirovich [Shabdurasulov] to persevere.  I believe that the hysteria around the analysis programme should come to an end quite soon.  After all, the prime minister is an adult, although his present actions resemble those of a wild teenager who is acting out his hang-ups.”
        Igor Shabdurasulov, ORT’s general director, also agreed to comment on the situation:
        “On [27th February], I called on Sergey [Dorenko], and in the course of our conversation, we reached the conclusion that it would be better for the channel if somebody else from his team presented the programme.  There are changes for the better:  a decision has been adopted in principle that the analysis programme will go on the air and Dorenko’s team will work on it.  Sergey directly supervises the programme, creates its structure, and selects the material.  But perhaps it will be presented by one of the team’s analysts.  Yet I cannot rule out that Dorenko will appear on the airwaves as early as next week.”

‘Komsomolskaya Pravda,’ Moscow, March 2, 1999

III.  Controversial ORT presenter denies sickness reports.

        The “Vremya with Sergey Dorenko” programme has not been shown for a second week running.  The channel’s official explanation is that Dorenko has the flu.  A ‘Kommersant’ special correspondent, Nataliya Gevorkyan, has learnt, however, that the rumours of Dorenko’s illness are highly exaggerated.
[Gevorkyan]        Are you sick?
[Dorenko]        It would seem so.  At any rate, I have read that somewhere.  No- one told me about it.  No-one warned me that I was supposed to be sick.
[Gevorkyan]         So what is going on?
[Dorenko]        I think the channel is and always was heavily dependent on the state.  The current power struggle, the shift in power from the Kremlin to the White House [Russian parliament], has influenced the channel and created a wave of pressure that has been difficult to resist.
[Gevorkyan]         What form has this pressure taken?
[Dorenko]        From what I have heard, it has taken the form of direct telephone calls and direct demands.  They are not calling me, however.  Luckily, I have such a bad reputation that they are not calling me . . . .
[Gevorkyan]         Is it usually so easy for you to agree with their decisions?
[Dorenko]         I agree that there has been no personal freedom and that business has not been free of the state for a single minute in Russia.  It is on that basis that I either agree or disagree with everything else.  I have a large team and, as I once told you, I cannot afford to buy a TV channel for my team now.
[Gevorkyan]         Has the team stayed out with you or has it been working on the “Vremya” programme?
[Dorenko]         We are putting together some special reports.  We are putting some of them on the air and we are holding the ones that can wait.
[Gevorkyan]        Are you still involved in the preparation of the Saturday broadcasts?
[Dorenko]        No.
[Gevorkyan]         How long will that last?
[Dorenko]         I do not know.  Maybe the fierce attacks will stop and we can all relax a little.
[Gevorkyan]         On your last show you made a mistake.  I am referring to the item about the prime minister’s family.
[Dorenko]         That was just a minor point.  In essence, I said—and I am happy that I was the first—that [Prime Minister Yevgeniy] Primakov had not really been focusing on the economy in the past five months.  He was concentrating on controlling the media and law enforcement agencies.
[Gevorkyan]        Still, getting back to that mistake . . . .
[Dorenko]         I reported that an article in the January issue of the “Airline Business” magazine said the prime minister’s family was in the airline business.  I not only cited the source, but also held up the magazine and pointed to the statement in the article.  That report cannot be denied:  The magazine did publish that information.  Our lack of any information about the prime minister’s family cannot be denied either.  Considering Raisa Maksimovna and the impression she made on people, this may be a good thing, but it is also a characteristic of the leaders of the Politburo era.  That seems strange to me.

‘Kommersant’ web site, Moscow, February 16, 1999

 

Last Updated: 11/20/99

 

© 1999 Post-Soviet Media Law & Policy Newsletter
Designed and maintained by Peter Yu

Web Policy