InsideArchivesContact UsMaps

 

HUNGARY

I.  Protests against ruling on language use.

        According to a recent decision by the Romanian National Audiovisual Council, every audiovisual programme made in minority languages—including dispatches from various scenes and live programmes—must be translated [dubbed or subtitled] into Romanian.  The decision sparked off outrage among editors of minority-language programmes and ethnic Hungarian politicians.
[Reporter]        The compulsory translation applies to feature and documentary films, children’s’ programmes, interviews as well as dispatches from outside Romania.
[Zsolt Galfalvi, Romanian Television board member, in Hungarian]        One of the ruling’s points makes Hungarian or other non-Romanian programmes possible if they are translated immediately into Romanian.  Practically, this means the end of live programmes.
[Reporter]        Hungarian and German-language minority programmes on the Romanian public service television have already been subtitled for two years.  According to Zsolt Galfalvi, this is absolutely normal because in this way they can be understood by non-Romanian speakers as well.  The new ruling, however, is considered by many to be a discriminative measure.
[Galfalvi]        If it helps to attract and increase the number of viewers, there is no problem with it.  The problem is caused by the intention of restricting the possibility of making programmes in our own language.
[Reporter]        The decision has also been criticized by Bela Marko, chairman of the Hungarian Democratic Union of Romania [UDMR].
[Marko]        A few days ago the Audiovisual Council took a discriminative decision on the use of languages in television broadcasts.  This is unacceptable for us.
[Reporter]        Song excerpts, foreign language lessons and news programmes broadcast in minority-language programmes are exempt from the rules and do not apply to non-Romanian satellite programmes transmitted by cable.  However, translation into Romanian language or dubbing is compulsory for TV programmes produced by cable TV companies.
        Since the ruling takes effect only after its publication in the Romanian official gazette, those affected have announced that they will do everything possible to prevent the council from approving the final text in this form.

Duna TV satellite service, Budapest, March 1, 1999

II.  PM wants review of radio-TV system.

        Prime Minister Viktor Orban dealt with three issues in his usual Wednesday morning [24th February] statement [to Hungarian radio].  Janos Hollos has interviewed Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
[Hollos]        The Supreme Court has ruled that the National Radio and Television Body [ORTT] must annul the contract it signed with the [Hungarian subsidiary of the German] television company RTL.  One would think that such a thing is almost unthinkable in cases that involve 8bn forints, 14bn forints—the cost of a commercial TV frequency.
[Orban]        If the law demands that such an action should be taken, if the court rules that this was the situation [that the granting of the licence to RTL was illegal], then the decision must be implemented.
[Q]        To put it perhaps a bit bluntly, it can cause an international scandal.
[A]        Well, I am looking forward with great interest to the views of media experts, lawyers, the parliamentary cultural committee and the positions by members of the government.  To be sure, some time ago, in late November or December, I already wrote to the cultural committee’ s chairman asking him to start a six-party consultation to resolve the impossible situation of television broadcasting [in Hungary] and to enable the rescuing of public service TV companies, which are in a tight situation—although at the time I had mainly in mind the public service TV companies.
        So, I think that the current Supreme Court ruling is another argument in favour of a review by Hungarian parliament of the Hungarian radio and television system, including, by the way, the legal status of the ORTT too, to amend the law—in agreement with the opposition if possible because the media law is a two-thirds-majority law—in line with the accumulated experience.

Hungarian Radio, Budapest, February 24, 1999

III.  Row continues over commercial RTL TV licence.

        Hungary’s Supreme Court passed a legally-binding verdict on [22nd February], establishing that the National Radio and Television Board (ORTT) should terminate its broadcasting contract with Magyar RTL Rt immediately.
        The court declared that ORTT proceeded illegally when it accepted the formally invalid bid submitted by Magyar RTL Rt for one of the terrestrial commercial channels, concluded a broadcasting contract with the company and deviated from the rules of evaluation specified in the invitation for bids.
        Court proceedings were initiated in 1997 by the First Hungarian Commercial Television Rt, which participated in the bidding under the name Irisz TV.  The proceedings were initiated against ORTT, and the two winners of the bidding, the US-German-Hungarian MTM-SBS Televizio Rt (TV2) and the German-Hungarian Magyar RTL Rt (RTL Klub).
        With its verdict, the Supreme Court has altered the 25th March 1998 ruling of the Metropolitan Court, which dismissed the action of Irisz TV.  For the commercial channel of RTL Klub, a new competition will probably be invited.

MTI news agency, Budapest, February 22, 1999

 

Last Updated: 11/20/99

 

© 1999 Post-Soviet Media Law & Policy Newsletter
Designed and maintained by Peter Yu

Web Policy